WATCH TEST

Track Suited: TAG Heuer Monaco Calibre 11 Edition Steve McQueen


The TAG Heuer Monaco Calibre 11 Edition Steve McQueen, an updated version of the watch McQueen wore in the movie “Le Mans,” has racing written all over it. Did it take the checkered flag in our test? Find out in this test.

More than four decades have passed since Steve McQueen wore a Heuer Monaco chronograph in the car-racing movie “Le Mans.” A few years ago, TAG Heuer (the company added “TAG” to its name in 1985) launched a commemorative edition of the watch called the Monaco Calibre 11 Edition Steve McQueen. We took it out for a test drive. The watch’s styling evokes its racing heritage. It has racing stripes on its dial – along with a logo that reads simply “Heuer” in homage to its pre-TAG origin − and a perforated strap. The watch is big – 39 mm by 39 mm and 15 mm thick – but it’s very comfortable. Nothing scratches, pinches, or rubs. The clasp and supple calfskin strap both feel pleasant on the wrist.

TH_Aufmacher

As in the original, the chrono pushers are on the right and the crown on the left.

The movement is a Sellita SW 300 base, with Glucydur balance, paired with a chronograph module made specifically for TAG by Dubois Dépraz. (Most other Monaco chronographs contain the ETA 2894.) The movement’s configuration enables TAG to place the crown on the left side of the case while keeping the chronograph pushers on the right, the same arrangement that was used in the original Monaco. (That watch, launched in 1969, was one of the world’s first automatic chronographs. It contained a caliber developed by Breitling, Büren and Dubois Dépraz, and, like the caliber in our tested watch, was numbered “11.”) It is accomplished by turning the base movement by 180 degrees and then installing the chronograph module in the opposite direction so the push buttons are in their usual position.

The movement, Caliber 11, is based on the Sellita SW 300
The movement, Caliber 11, is based on the Sellita SW 300

Having the crown on the left gives the watch historical accuracy and an unusual look to boot, but does it offer any practical advantages? One benefit is clear: assuming you are wearing the watch on your left hand, the crown won’t dig into the back of your hand when you bend your wrist sharply, to do a few push-ups, for example. Unfortunately, the disadvantages outweigh this plus. First, a right-handed wearer must take the watch off before he can wind or set it because he’ll find it cumbersome or impossible to operate the crown with his right hand. Second, after he takes the watch off, he’ll have to do the winding or setting with his left hand, and not every right-handed wearer will find this easy. Third, the directions for winding and setting are reversed, i.e., you not only have to use the “wrong” hand, you also have to move your fingers in the opposite direction to the one you’re accustomed to.

T he watch bears the old “Heuer” logo, which was used when the Monaco first came out.
The watch bears the old “Heuer” logo, which was used when the Monaco first came out.

The case has many chamfers and edges, and precise borders between polished and satin-finished surfaces. 

The watch has another operation-related problem: the stop-start chronograph button is too easy to push in. A smoothly running button is generally a desirable feature, but the one on our test watch yielded to pressure so readily that contact with the tightly fitting sleeve of the wearer’s jacket was enough to stop the chronograph prematurely. These shortcomings are balanced out by several virtues. The crown is large and easy to grasp; the chronograph pushers are also big enough to operate easily; and the movement has both a stop-seconds function and, for the date display, a rapid-reset mechanism. The clasp, made of stainless steel, is sturdy, well-crafted and user-friendly. You open it by pushing two large buttons. It snaps firmly shut afterwards. The strap can be extended – continuously, not by increments – via a clamping mechanism that holds the strap securely in the chosen position.

A clamping mechanism lets you adjust the strap to any length.
A clamping mechanism lets you adjust the strap to any length.

The clasp is designed so that more leather than metal is in contact with your wrist, thus enhancing wearing comfort. In terms of quality, the strap, laboriously hand-sewn, is on a par with the clasp. If you want to change the strap or remove it to clean the side of the case between the lugs, you’ll be pleased to find little slides on the lugs. No tools are required: a bit of force is all that’s needed to move these slides. The crystal and case are also well-crafted. The former, which is cambered and has elaborate faceting along its edges, is made of sapphire even though this material is notoriously difficult to work with. (Until 2009, TAG Heuer used Plexiglas.) The longitudinal curve of the crystal conforms to the curve of the case, which rises higher between the lugs than at the left and right sides. This complex shape is costly to achieve compared with an ordinary inset crystal.

The case has many chamfers and edges. The borders between polished and satin-finished surfaces are very precise. The chrono pushers are highly detailed and distinctively shaped. They are set in bushings that protect them from impacts and give them greater hold, thus minimizing wiggling. The caseback has a round sapphire window and is held in place by screws. There are only four of them, standard for a square or rectangular watch, but they are thick and sturdy. If there were anything to complain about with respect to the case, it perhaps would be the small size of the caseback window. Although there is no compelling technical reason for it, this window is smaller than the movement. The edges of the movement and of the oscillating weight thus remain hidden. Beneath the window, we were nonetheless pleased to discover that TAG Heuer uses the high-quality “premium” version of the SW 300. This quality grade is comparable to the “top” grade of the ETA 2892, which has precision worthy of a COSC certificate but is not sent to COSC to be tested. (The SW 300 has the same specs as the ETA 2892; it was designed to be used as an alternative to that movement.)

The case and crystal are complex in shape but very well made.
The case and crystal are complex in shape but very well made.

The main dial achieves a very successful retro auto-racing look by eliminating numerals to mark the hours and minutes.

The chronograph module, which is on the dial side of the movement and hence concealed, relies on the simple but effective cam method of switching, which we’re familiar with from ETA’s workhorse 7750. The chronograph works via vertical coupling, which prevents spasmodic jumping of the chronograph seconds hand when the stopwatch function starts. The watch’s running behavior was basically good. On the wrist and on the timing machine, with and without the chronograph running, the average daily gain was about three seconds. The amplitude scarcely declined when the chronograph was switched on, which leads us to conclude that all the working surfaces in the chronograph module are well crafted. We discovered a maximum difference of 11 seconds among the various positions in ordinary operation and 12 seconds with the chronograph switched on. That’s why the watch earned only six points in the “rate results” category. The low daily gain and stable amplitude would otherwise have earned the watch a perfect 10.

The dial’s legibility is also a drawback. The easiest display to read is the minutes counter at 9 o’clock (its hand runs continually rather than jumping forward once a minute). The main dial achieves its very successful retro and auto-racing look by eliminating numerals to mark the hours and minutes, but this makes the watch harder to read. Furthermore, the contrast between the luminous areas on the center-mounted hands and the mostly pale dial is very weak. The luminous material is applied sparingly and glows only dimly in the dark. And the running seconds subdial is confusing because it has so many markers. Poor legibility won’t dissuade fans of mechanical timekeeping who have taken a shine to this smartly styled watch. The watch’s price, $5,900*, is not too high given the watch’s expensive movement, its high quality and its good looks.

Pros

+ Attractive styling

+ Good craftsmanship

+ Comfortable to wear

Cons

– Poor legibility

– Greatest deviation of rate too high

SPECS:

Manufacturer: TAG Heuer SA, Rue Louis-Joseph Chevrolet 6a, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
Reference number: CAW211D.FC6300
Functions: Hours, minutes, small seconds, 30-minute chronograph with counter, date display, stop-seconds function
Movement: Sellita SW 300 “premium”-grade with Dubois Dépraz module DD 2006 exclusive to TAG Heuer, automatic, 28,800 vph, 55 jewels, index regulation with eccentric screw, Incabloc shock absorption, cam switching, vertical coupling, Glucydur balance, 42-hour power reserve; diameter = 30.4 mm, height = 9.6 mm
Case: Stainless steel with domed sapphire crystal, four screws hold caseback in place, sapphire window in caseback; water resistant to 100 meters
Strap and clasp: Hand-sewn cut calfskin strap with folding clasp made of stainless steel
Rate results (Deviations in seconds per 24 hours, with chronograph switched off/on)
Dial up                       +5 / +5
Dial down                   +6 / +5
Crown up                    –2 / –2
Crown down               +8 / +8
Crown left                  +6 / +5
Crown right                 –3 / –4
Greatest deviation of rate                   11 / 12
Average deviation            +3.3 / +2.8
Average amplitude:
Flat positions     294° / 290°
Hanging positions         271° / 260°
Dimensions: 39 mm x 39 mm; thickness = 15 mm; weight = 124 g
Price: $5,900*

SCORES:
Strap and clasp (max. 10 points): The perfectly crafted calfskin strap is equipped with a quick-change system and a terrific clasp.    10
Operation (5): Two real disadvantages are the placement of the crown on the left and the too easily triggered start-stop button. Setting the watch is facilitated by a rapid-reset function for the date and by a stop-seconds function.    3
Case (10): The case is complex and perfectly finished, but the window in the caseback is rather small.    9
Design (15): Very attractive retro styling with crown on the left, which is faithful to the original Monaco design.    14
Legibility (5): The hands are the right length and the scale on the elapsed-minutes counter is clearly calibrated, but the main dial offers little contrast and has neither hour nor minutes numerals, the seconds subdial is cluttered and the luminosity is mediocre.    2
Wearing comfort (10): Given its size, this watch is much more comfortable than one would expect, thanks to its supple strap, well-designed clasp and moderate weight.    9
Movement (20): This modular chronograph based on a caliber manufactured in large series doesn’t embody the utmost in haute horlogerie, but the movement is worthy of respect thanks to its Glucydur balance, vertical coupling and well-crafted moving parts.     14
Rate results (10): The daily deviation of rate is small and the amplitude is stable, but the greatest deviation was high.    6
Overall value (15): The price is  acceptable for this very well-crafted and attractive watch.    11
TOTAL:          78 POINTS

This review originally appeared in the October, 2013 issue of WatchTime Magazine. Photos by OK-Photography.

* Prices are subject to change.

3 Responses to “Track Suited: TAG Heuer Monaco Calibre 11 Edition Steve McQueen”

Show all responses
  1. Randy Rogers

    The critique of setting and winding the Watch on the wrist may be a little bogus, as I’ve not seen anyone try and set a Stem and Crown, while wearing Timepiece, regardless of Crown position, it’s done best and most efficiently off the wrist. The Pushers issue is important and a Design flaw, the Rates are also an issue. The good news for TAG-Heuer is that now when they take the image of Steve McQueen in Jo Siffert’s Driver’s Suit, the legitimacy of having the left hand Crown is back, as the recent shots have super-imposed the Right Hand Crown which is ethically challenging as it was never there, so convenience and revisionist history is corrected.

    Reply
  2. Randy Rogers

    The critique of setting and winding the Watch on the wrist may be a little bogus, as I’ve not seen anyone try and set a Stem and Crown, while wearing Timepiece, regardless of Crown position, it’s done best and most efficiently off the wrist. The Pushers issue is important and a Design flaw, the Rates are also an issue. The good news for TAG-Heuer is that now when they take the image of Steve McQueen in Jo Siffert’s Driver’s Suit, the legitimacy of having the left hand Crown is back, as the recent shots have super-imposed the Right Hand Crown which is ethically challenging as it was never there, so convenience and revisionist history is corrected.

    Reply
  3. Apart from the difficulties a right handed person would face with this watch and its very high price, this is probably the only TAG Heuer model watch I would ever really consider buying if it had TAG Heuer’s own in-house movement. It would have been a no brainer!! It would definitely have be on my hit list! For the life of me….Why has TAG Heuer chosen to not include an in-house movement for such a historical timepiece beats me!! I don’t want to hear the excuse that we are always given being that is was to keep the costs down. On such a historical piece I don’t believe a diehard collector would give a damn!!

    Reply
Leave a Reply